Home | Current Issue | About Us | Subscribe | Advertise
Contact Us
| Feedback
| 4Ps TEAM
| 4Ps Archives
B School

Special Columns
Arindam Chaudhuri, Editor-in-Chief, 4Ps B&M Editor-in-Chief
Dr. Arindam Chaudhuri
A.Sandeep Editor's Desk
Share |
Go to Page Number - 1   2   
The Geography of Brands
Professor Sanjay K. Dhar and Professor Jean-Pierre Dube of booth school of business believe that analysing brand performance across markets rather than simply over time may be a more fruitful approach
Issue Date - 17/11/2011
In the consumer packaged goods (CPG) industry, the most widely used measure of brand performance is brand market share – the unit sales of a brand divided by the unit sales of the entire category.

Most research about purchase behaviour and the effectiveness of marketing tools for CPG brands is based on time-series studies, which typically use data covering a few weeks to a few years in a particular geographic market. Until now, there has been relatively little research exploring the geographic distribution of market shares in the CPG industry.

In our study titled Consumer Packaged Goods in the United States: National Brands, Local Branding, we along with Prof. Bart J. Bronnenberg of UCLA, documented several striking geographic patterns in the performance of national brands using a large scanner database spanning many CPG categories and US regional markets.

The geography of CPG industries is an understudied area with several important potential directions for future research. We began this study as an exploration rather than a test. Finding a relatively large geographic component of brand shares was surprising.

We pooled market share information across time and geographic markets for the top two leading national brands in 31 CPG categories. The geographic component of these data accounted for 92% of the variation in market shares. Furthermore, brand shares appear to be stable over time within a market.

With only a few exceptions, researchers have previously been unable to collect truly long-run information about brand performance; CPG data sources, at best, cover a couple of years in any given market. In contrast, the geographic patterns appear to be a long-run phenomenon. These data may present marketers with a rich new source of long-run marketing data with which to study the long-run effects of marketing investments.

Across markets, the geographic variation in market shares, indices of brand quality perceptions, and the identity of local brand-share leaders is so significant that it calls into question the concept and relevance of a national brand. These findings also highlight problems in using studies focusing on performance over time to determine the effectiveness of marketing tools when the data focuses only on single markets. Since market share variation over time appears to capture a minor component of overall variation, and it is difficult to obtain databases for long time periods, inferences about the impact of marketing variables based on short time series of market shares may be imprecise.

A Broad-Spectrum Approach
We used scanner data from AC Nielsen spanning 31 CPG categories in the 50 largest Nielsen designated Scantracks, each of which typically include a single metropolitan area and its suburbs. The data was sampled at four-week intervals between June 1992 and May 1995. Categories spanned food products from bread and bakery to frozen entrees/side dishes.

We investigated properties of CPG brand share data across brands, markets, and time, as well as several marketing variables. A brand share measure based on equivalent unit sales in each category/market/month was constructed. For each of the 31 categories, the data covers two brands in 50 markets over 39 months.

The most notable feature of the market share data was the high level of geographic variation. Regardless of the degree to which a product competed on the national level, the range and level of variation in a brand’s share was very similar. This suggests that the high level of variation is not simply due to brands avoiding certain markets.

After breaking down shares by time, market, and brand effects, as well as the interaction between the market and the brand, it was found that geographic variation explains considerably more of the market share variance than variation across time. Furthermore, the local market structure within a category varies considerably across geographic markets: one brand may be very strong in one market and relatively weak in another.

What are the limitations of focusing on a single market when analysing national brands? First, focusing on a single market ignores the cross-market dimension in the CPG industry, and thus does not focus on explaining the largest source of variation in the market-level performance of national CPG brands. Second, a major goal of quantitative marketing research is to determine the effects of a firm’s marketing investments. If variation in brand performance across markets is related to such investments, focusing on a single market may lead to misleading estimates of these effects.

Studying variations in market shares across markets, rather than focusing on movement over time, may be more informative about the long-run effects of marketing investments, advertising, and distribution. These findings may impact strategic marketing decisions regarding the product, such as local positioning and branding.

What is the Relevance of a National Brand?
For brands that garnered the largest shares of a category’s national market, we observed considerable regional variation in market share, perceived quality, and share dominance. In specific Scantrack markets, a large disparity between a brand’s national share and its local share existed.

The set of brands was expanded to include all local share leaders across categories in order to investigate whether a national brand – defined as a brand with distribution in all 50 Scantrack markets has inherent advantages in terms of local performance.

When a national brand leads in a market, it tends to lead with 12 more market share points than a local or regional brand. We did not observe meaningful inherent national brand effects.

Can the national performance of a brand predict how the brand will perform in local markets? We suggest that a single geographic market provides only limited information about a brand’s overall performance. Furthermore, within local markets, there is a stronger tendency for one brand to dominate in terms of shares.

Focusing on either the national market or a single geographic market may not only limit the information about a brand’s performance, it may also limit the information about the category as a whole. For example, while the national market for coffee appears to be dominated by two firms, in most local markets there is one dominant firm.

In addition to scanner data, we also used information on perceived brand quality collected by Young & Rubicam Associates for its Brand Asset Valuator Database to study geographic patterns in quality perceptions of the same brand. The quality perception data showed comparable levels of variation as the market share data. The clear lack of consistent quality perception across markets further erodes the concept of a national brand.

We think that future research could benefit from a better theoretical and empirical understanding of the sources of these local share differences.

Share |
Go to Page Number - 1   2        Next
Home | Current Issue | About Us | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact Us | Feedback | 4Ps TEAM | 4Ps Calendar | 4Ps Archives
4Ps Business and Marketing is also associated with :
Copyright © Planman Media Pvt. Ltd. 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved