Home | Current Issue | About Us | Subscribe | Advertise
Contact Us
| Feedback
| 4Ps TEAM
| 4Ps Archives
International Column : Exclusive

Special Columns
Arindam Chaudhuri, Editor-in-Chief, 4Ps B&M Chief Consulting Editor's Desk
Rajita Chaudhuri
K.K.Srivastava Guest Column
K.K.Srivastava
Share |
Go to Page Number - 1   2   
INSTITUTE OF DESIGN
What Comes First?
How can innovation be applied to the innovation process itself to create products with greater return over a longer life cycle
Issue Date - 08/09/2011
 
Why is it that the “what” part of new product development gets such scant attention in the development process? What a new product should be is a question seldom seriously explored. In the world of advanced planning, the notion of “concept” is pretty narrowly constrained. True development of a new concept more often than not is ignored in favour of detailed investigation of variations on already-formed ideas introduced intact at the beginning of the process! The “concept” in this all-too-common model is most likely (1) a designated evolutionary replacement for a product already in production, (2) a preconceived idea that has occurred to a senior executive, or (3) a competitor’s new offering whose qualities must be met or exceeded. What happened to exploration & innovation at the concept level?

Competition
I am reminded of an old tale from operations research. A crack mountain climbing team is assembled to break the world’s record for climbing the highest mountain. With speed and efficiency they quickly reach the top, only to gaze on a nearby higher mountain. Moral: Find the right mountain before you climb. In a relaxed world, the team could move to the higher mountain and repeat their skillful climb. But in a highly competitive world, another team might have already found that mountain. The situation isn’t much different in the business world; there is little time for conceptual mistakes. Competition in most business fields has increased multifold in the years since World War II and the cold war. In the good old days, markets were relatively isolated and discrete. Wherever your company was, your markets were probably there too. And your competition was most likely similarly contained. In our global economy, a company faces competition from abroad in its home markets and probably has foreign branches of its own competing with foreign companies in their home markets. And all this is in addition to competition at home and now abroad from local companies also with foreign branches. The growth in competition has not been linear.

Coupled with the dramatic increases in the capabilities of information technologies, this has put severe pressure on the development process. To stay competitive, a company must now upgrade its product offerings at a frequency that mandates almost continuous change. And that doesn’t guarantee success. An obvious question is, what can be done to improve product development effectiveness? Or better stated, how can innovation be applied to the innovation process itself to create products with greater return over a longer life cycle?

The Development Process
I think the answer lies in rethinking how efforts are distributed in the development process. If the process is viewed as what takes place from initialisation until achievement of a new product specification, it usually now is a one-step process in which the focus is the realisation of a given concept. The range of exploration is limited by the commitment to concept, and the primary development activity is “giving form”. Not unexpectedly, the innovations produced are at the design detail and craftsmanship levels, levels below the concept level. Innovative improvements in function, human factors and cultural fit are examples of the former; innovations to improve quality control in production are examples of the latter.

 
Reflecting on the experience of the mountain climbers, development should be redefined as a two-step process in which a separate, front-end innovation effort is devoted to finding, exploring and developing a concept (see chart). The concept in this model is a result – the end product of a dedicated planning phase of the process. It is, in essence, a highly refined charter or project brief for a follow-on team that will conduct a second designing phase of the development process.

Concept vs Details
This model forces concentration on innovation at the concept level where ideas can range broadly and the revolutionary may be as likely as the evolutionary. In an environment where new ideas are expected and sought out, an innovative concept is much more competitive than innovative details. Witness Apple’s iPhone, iPod and iPad, or from a longer perspective, the Sony Walkman.

A good concept, however, doesn’t have to be revolutionary. In fact, it is possible to get so far in front of potential adopters that the concept fails. The Xerox Star system that preceded Apple’s Macintosh was too far ahead of its time. It took Steve Jobs’ clear recognition of its value as a concept and clearer view of how to develop it to turn it into the interface system we all use in various versions today.

So what makes a great concept? A great concept will be complete; it will have integrity. It also may be surprising (it will be better if it is). But for sure, it will fit needs & aspirations like a glove.

Needs and aspirations imply users, and meeting their expectations is a major part of what builds integrity into a concept. We all hear about designing for the “customer” and meeting the needs of the “end user”, but these users are but two of many whose needs should be considered. The customer is the buyer; the end user is the operator. Meeting the needs of the user means meeting the needs of these users – and: the user who ships the product, sells it, cleans it, maintains it, repairs it, adapts it, recycles it and retires it, to name just some. To each, the product looks uniquely different.

          
Share |
 
Go to Page Number - 1   2        Next
 
 
 
 
Home | Current Issue | About Us | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact Us | Feedback | 4Ps TEAM | 4Ps Calendar | 4Ps Archives
 
4Ps Business and Marketing is also associated with :
Copyright © Planman Media Pvt. Ltd. 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved